Tier-I cities identified in Maharashtra under the first phase of ‘Housing for All’
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3043
ANSWERED ON MARCH 12, 2020
HOUSING FOR ALL IN MAHARASHTRA
SHRI RANJEETSINGH HINDURAO NAIK NIMBALKAR
Will the Minister of HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS be pleased to state:
(a) the details of Tier-I cities identified in Maharashtra under the first phase of ‘Housing for All’ by 2020;
(b) the details of the funds earmarked for these cities during the current financial year;
(c) the details of the amount released to Maharashtra under the first phase of the said mission as on date;
(d) whether no specific proposals have been made in providing housing to the urban destitute in these cases; and
[post_ads]
(e) the measures taken by the Government for proper monitoring for timely completion of these schemes?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS
(SHRI HARDEEP SINGH PURI)
(a)& (b) All statutory towns as per census 2011 and towns notified subsequently including Notified Planning/Development Areas in Maharashtra as well as in other States/UTs are eligible for coverage under PMAY (U) Mission. In the case of Maharashtra, a list of Class-I cities along with the central assistance sanctioned during current Financial Year is enclosed at Annexure-I.
(c) PMAY(U) has no provision of phase-wise covering of cites/towns. All statutory towns as per census 2011 and towns notified subsequently including Notified Planning/Development Areas are eligible for coverage in the Mission. So far, an amount of Rs.5,681.65 crores has been released to Maharashtra under PMAY(U).
(d) Yes, Sir. However, urban destitute can avail benefit under various components of PMAY(U), if otherwise eligible as perscheme guidelines.
(e) The following measures have been taken by Government for proper monitoring for timely completion of the scheme – –
- Central Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee (CSMC) constituted under the chairmanship of Secretary, MoHUA generally meets every month to sanction central assistance for new projects and reviews the progress of the Mission
- Ministry monitors progress of the Mission through periodic review meetings, video-conferences and field visits.
- State Level Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee(SLSMC) under chairmanship of Chief Secretary of the concerned State/UT reviews the progress of implementation of the Mission at the State level.
- The scheme is also being monitored through periodic MIS reports from States/UTs.
- Payment through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) Mode and Aadhaar seeding of beneficiaries for transparency and accountability.
- Use of Information/Space Technology through PMAY(U)- MIS (Management Information System), Bhuvan Portal, PFMS (Public Financial Management System) and Geo- tagging/Geo-fencing of sanctioned houses for effective monitoring.
[post_ads_2]
Annexure I referred in reply to LSQ No – 3043 due for 12.03.2020
List of Class-I cities along with details of houses and central assistance sanctioned over all as well as during the current year under PMAY(U)
S.No. |
Name of city |
Houses Sanctioned during 2019-
20
|
Central Assistance Sanctioned during 2019-20 (Rs. in cr.)
|
Cumulative Houses Sanctioned
|
Cumulative Central assistance Sanctioned (Rs. in cr.)
|
|
1
|
Achalpur
|
149
|
2.47
|
699
|
10.83
|
|
2
|
Ahmednagar
|
1,949
|
37.37
|
5,511
|
103.97
|
|
3
|
Akola
|
625
|
11.00
|
7,094
|
111.93
|
|
4
|
Ambarnath
|
1,019
|
23.70
|
30,446
|
491.82
|
|
5
|
Amravati
|
1,646
|
28.00
|
9,992
|
156.30
|
|
6
|
Aurangabad
|
1,591
|
36.69
|
7,366
|
149.63
|
|
7
|
Badlapur
|
1,627
|
39.18
|
14,743
|
287.00
|
|
8
|
Barshi
|
67
|
1.27
|
5,444
|
82.08
|
|
9
|
Bhiwandi Nizampur
|
1,117
|
22.66
|
8,560
|
142.80
|
|
10
|
Bhusawal
|
122
|
2.48
|
5,806
|
89.56
|
|
11
|
Bid
|
2,241
|
34.42
|
3,195
|
51.10
|
|
12
|
Chandrapur
|
132
|
2.77
|
2,789
|
44.50
|
|
13
|
Dhule
|
356
|
6.73
|
2,242
|
36.55
|
|
14
|
Gondiya
|
35
|
0.65
|
1,109
|
16.99
|
|
15
|
Greater Mumbai
|
4,222
|
76.87
|
2,12,145
|
2,230.17
|
|
16
|
Hinganghat
|
373
|
5.66
|
1,899
|
28.62
|
|
17
|
Ichalkaranji
|
287
|
4.77
|
1,335
|
21.13
|
|
18
|
Jalgaon
|
1,223
|
25.30
|
5,268
|
101.15
|
|
19
|
Jalna
|
256
|
4.63
|
1,862
|
31.70
|
|
20
|
Kalyan-Dombivli
|
2,667
|
62.68
|
9,743
|
225.46
|
|
21
|
Kolhapur
|
901
|
18.34
|
3,745
|
69.50
|
|
22
|
Latur
|
3,468
|
54.08
|
6,497
|
102.37
|
|
23
|
Malegaon
|
295
|
4.99
|
1,199
|
20.56
|
|
24
|
Mira-Bhayandar
|
935
|
21.55
|
3,081
|
70.91
|
|
25
|
Nagpur
|
12,917
|
206.13
|
37,347
|
595.41
|
|
26
|
Nanded Waghala
|
2,246
|
34.79
|
9,879
|
151.62
|
|
27
|
Nandurbar
|
127
|
2.49
|
662
|
11.00
|
|
28
|
Nashik
|
5,053
|
120.23
|
19,353
|
438.03
|
|
29
|
Navi Mumbai
|
63,644
|
967.11
|
1,16,806
|
1,791.12
|
|
30
|
Navi Mumbai Panvel Raigarh (CT)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
31
|
Osmanabad
|
370
|
5.92
|
2,987
|
45.53
|
|
32
|
Panvel
|
3,601
|
76.93
|
24,227
|
433.82
|
|
33
|
Parbhani
|
715
|
11.24
|
2,073
|
32.08
|
|
34
|
Pimpri Chinchwad
|
3,480
|
74.60
|
18,487
|
345.87
|
|
35
|
Pune
|
31,959
|
599.10
|
1,13,117
|
1,966.88
|
|
36
|
Sangli Miraj Kupwad
|
505
|
10.86
|
2,002
|
39.32
|
|
37
|
Satara
|
704
|
15.96
|
4,926
|
89.85
|
|
38
|
Solapur
|
11,365
|
173.79
|
48,259
|
721.88
|
|
39
|
Thane
|
16,630
|
297.39
|
43,539
|
805.57
|
|
40
|
Udgir
|
421
|
6.38
|
1,625
|
24.50
|
|
41
|
Ulhasnagar
|
30
|
0.71
|
130
|
3.03
|
|
42
|
Vasai-Virar
|
2,505
|
59.72
|
68,729
|
1,114.18
|
|
43
|
Wardha
|
101
|
1.94
|
960
|
15.51
|
|
44
|
Yavatmal
|
871
|
13.79
|
3,768
|
59.18
|
|
Total
|
1,84,547
|
3,207.30
|
8,70,646
|
13,360.92
|
Source : Lok Sabha
नोट :- हमारे वेबसाइट www.indiangovtscheme.com पर ऐसी जानकारी रोजाना आती रहती है, तो आप ऐसी ही सरकारी योजनाओं की जानकारी पाने के लिए हमारे वेबसाइट www.indiangovtscheme.com से जुड़े रहे
******