LOK SABHA
IMPLEMENTATION OF PMAY
4447. SHRI PRATHAP SIMHA
SHRI RANJEET SINGH HINDURAO NAIK NIMBALKAR
SHRI SUDHAKAR TUKARAM SHRANGARE
Will the Minister of RURAL DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state:
(a) the annual target as well as houses actually constructed under PMAY-G during the last three years, State-wise and year-wise especially in Karnataka-Mysore district, Maharashtra-Madha Lok Sabha Constituency and Latur district;
(b) the strategy adopted for achieving the housing for all target by August, 2022; and
(c) the outcome of the physical verification of the constructed houses done recently, State-wise?
(SADHVI NIRANJAN JYOTI)
(c) Performance monitoring of PMAY-G is done through real time capture of progress using workflow enabled transactional data in MIS i.e. AwaasSoft. For process monitoring mechanisms like inspection is done by central teams [Area Officers and National Level Monitors(NLM)], monitoring by District Development Coordination and Monitoring (DISHA) Committee headed by Member of Parliament, Social Audit and through State Level PMUs.
The National Level Monitoring (NLM) system of Ministry of Rural Development is a third party monitoring and reporting mechanism working towards regular assessment of implementation of Rural Development Programmes/ Schemes including PMAY-G in the country. The NLMs during their Regular monitoring during FY 2019-20 covered 19 States, 266 districts with 946 blocks and 2319 villages across the country for assessing the processes being followed in implementation of the scheme including physical inspection of houses constructed under the scheme. NLMs have observed that the quality of construction of the completed houses was ‘Excellent’ in about 63% and ‘Good’ in 32% of the verified houses. NLMs have found that in 85% of GPs sensitization of beneficiaries have taken place in all the visited GPs of Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Kerala, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura and West Bengal, the sensitization efforts have been made. NLMs have reported that in the visited GPs of Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Kerala, Odisha, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, on an average more than ten trained masons were available, where as in some States, like, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Punjab only 2-3 trained masons were available in GPs. For the cases, where there was need for action on part of the State Government/UT Administration, the matter has already been taken up with States for compliance.
Annexure-I
STATEMENT IN REPLY TO PART (a) OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4447 TO BE ANSWERED ON 21.03.2021 REGARDING ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER TO PMAY-G.
State-wise and year-wise annual target and houses constructed under Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana- Gramin (PMAY-G) during the last three years.
(units in Nos.)
|
S.No. |
State Name |
2017-18 |
2018-19 |
2019-20 |
|||
|
Annual |
Completed |
Annual |
Completed |
Annual |
Completed |
||
|
1 |
ARUNACHAL PRADESH |
2187 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
7500 |
747 |
|
2 |
ASSAM |
40119 |
26059 |
0 |
159017 |
256043 |
84009 |
|
3 |
BIHAR |
538959 |
28135 |
0 |
581833 |
1302259 |
376220 |
|
4 |
CHHATTISGARH |
206372 |
365875 |
348960 |
341381 |
151100 |
34587 |
|
5 |
GOA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
3 |
|
6 |
GUJARAT |
91108 |
95281 |
0 |
83096 |
107100 |
35589 |
|
7 |
HARYANA |
9598 |
6676 |
0 |
5961 |
0 |
6670 |
|
8 |
HIMACHAL PRADESH |
2511 |
3504 |
0 |
3096 |
900 |
447 |
|
9 |
JAMMU AND KASHMIR |
21752 |
1979 |
0 |
14442 |
62897 |
5610 |
|
10 |
JHARKHAND |
159052 |
188299 |
138884 |
272679 |
322000 |
156975 |
|
11 |
KERALA |
9872 |
9444 |
0 |
6519 |
0 |
779 |
|
12 |
MADHYA PRADESH |
389532 |
636354 |
565914 |
679290 |
600000 |
271274 |
|
13 |
MAHARASHTRA |
150934 |
145631 |
68464 |
201969 |
354501 |
92278 |
|
14 |
MANIPUR |
0 |
66 |
0 |
7655 |
8900 |
1151 |
|
15 |
MEGHALAYA |
3715 |
260 |
0 |
11329 |
17200 |
4995 |
|
16 |
MIZORAM |
1794 |
1333 |
0 |
900 |
1500 |
997 |
|
17 |
NAGALAND |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
5900 |
3687 |
|
18 |
ODISHA |
340498 |
431670 |
255958 |
403128 |
740464 |
361188 |
|
19 |
PUNJAB |
4000 |
608 |
0 |
12751 |
10000 |
410 |
|
20 |
RAJASTHAN |
223629 |
317728 |
213204 |
326595 |
450816 |
166764 |
|
21 |
SIKKIM |
0 |
372 |
0 |
646 |
0 |
34 |
|
22 |
TAMIL NADU |
130214 |
78680 |
21000 |
104388 |
200000 |
49987 |
|
23 |
TRIPURA |
1259 |
3333 |
0 |
20690 |
28838 |
6155 |
|
24 |
UTTAR PRADESH |
396594 |
817035 |
310764 |
426590 |
178900 |
174168 |
|
25 |
UTTARAKHAND |
4088 |
6237 |
0 |
5925 |
0 |
192 |
|
26 |
WEST BENGAL |
374629 |
589790 |
586333 |
739779 |
1083488 |
286340 |
|
27 |
ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR |
207 |
0 |
347 |
1 |
294 |
286 |
|
28 |
DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI |
756 |
1 |
4665 |
197 |
0 |
221 |
|
29 |
DAMAN AND DIU |
15 |
6 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
|
30 |
LAKSHADWEEP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
|
31 |
PUDUCHERRY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
32 |
ANDHRA PRADESH |
14439 |
27358 |
0 |
18679 |
0 |
5 |
|
33 |
KARNATAKA |
52284 |
34317 |
0 |
43760 |
86000 |
7085 |
|
34 |
TELANGANA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
3170117 |
3816031 |
2514493 |
4472427 |
5976600 |
2128862 |
|
|
State |
District |
2017-18 |
2018-19 |
2019-20 |
|||
|
Annual |
Houses |
Annual |
Houses |
Annual |
Houses |
||
|
KARNATAKA |
MYSORE |
5141 |
2919 |
0 |
0 |
7342 |
1 |
|
MAHARASHTRA |
SATARA* |
4713 |
4080 |
561 |
417 |
2342 |
1010 |
|
SOLAPUR* |
1047 |
806 |
2053 |
1733 |
10100 |
4871 |
|
|
LATUR |
715 |
471 |
318 |
290 |
1685 |
847 |
|